Prenatal Practice Staff Perceptions of Three Substance Use Screening Tools for Pregnant Women.

Publication Type
Journal Article
Year of Publication
2020
Authors
Trocin, Kathleen E; Weinstein, Nicole I; Oga, Emmanuel A; Mark, Katrina S; Coleman-Cowger, Victoria H
Secondary
J Addict Med
Volume
14
Pagination
139-144
Date Published
2020 Mar/Apr
Keywords
pregnant women; Prenatal; RXDRUGS
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: There is a need to identify an acceptable and comprehensive substance use screening tool for pregnant women in the United States. This qualitative study sought to better understand prenatal practice staff perceptions of three existing substance use screening tools for use among pregnant women in an outpatient practice setting.

METHODS: Eight focus groups with 40 total participants were conducted with clinical and administrative staff of 2 diverse Maryland prenatal practices to determine the acceptability and usability of 3 substance use screening tools (4P's Plus, NIDA-Modified Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test, and the Substance Use Risk Profile-Pregnancy scale). The focus groups were digitally recorded, transcribed, coded, and analyzed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS: Participant perceptions of screening tools were dependent upon screening tool length, tone, comprehensiveness, subjectivity, time frame of questions, and scoring and clinician instructions. Most participants preferred the 4P's Plus screening tool because it is brief, comprehensive, easy for the patient to understand, and excludes judgmental language and subjective questions.

CONCLUSIONS: These results provide valuable insight into the specific needs and preferences of prenatal practice staff as it relates to prenatal substance use screening and provides evidence that the 4P's Plus may be a preferred screening tool for standardized use in prenatal care.