Cataract Classification Using Serial Examinations in the Age-Related Eye Disease Study: Age-Related Eye Disease Study Report No. 24

Publication Type
Journal Article
Year of Publication
2008
Authors
SanGiovanni, JP; Chew, E; Agron, E; T, Clemons; Ferris III, FL; G, Gensler; AS, Lindblad; R, Milton; Seddon, J; Klein, R; Sperduto, R; The Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) Research Group
Secondary
Am J Ophthalmol
Volume
145
Start Page
504
Pagination
504-508
Date Published
03/2008
Keywords
Aged; aging; Algorithms; cataract; Cohort Studies; Dietary Supplements; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Lens Capsule- Crystalline; Lens- Crystalline; Male; Middle Aged; Phenotype; Photography; Prospective Studies; Research NIH Extramural
Abstract
PURPOSE: To describe use of serial lens examinations to assign cataract phenotype in the Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS). DESIGN: Cohort study. METHODS: Lens photographs were graded annually using the AREDS system for classifying cataracts. Nuclear grades (0.9 to 6.1) were assigned using standard photographs. Percentage of pupillary involvement was used to assign cortical and posterior subcapsular grades. Cutpoints were established for the presence or absence of each type of opacity (absent<4.0 for nuclear, <10% for cortical, and <5% of central 5 mm for posterior subcapsular). An algorithm weighted for grades at the last three examinations was used to assign cataract phenotype. Separately, cataract phenotype was assigned as grade predicted at final visit by linear regression of serial grades. Results from the two approaches were compared and final person phenotypes were established. These person cataract phenotype assignments were compared with phenotype assignments based on the last serial grade alone. RESULTS: Four thousand six hundred and twenty-eight AREDS participants aged 55 to 80 years at baseline had median follow-up of 10.6 years. Person phenotype assignments agreed for the two approaches in 4,557 (98.5%) participants after some algorithmic adjudication. Phenotypes were no cataract (n=1,418), nuclear (n=1,287), cortical (n=1,396), posterior subcapsular (n=541), cataract surgery and no specific opacity type (n=335), and questionable (n=426). Phenotype assignments based on serial grades and on last examination alone were in good agreement. CONCLUSIONS: Serial lens photographs obtained over a 10-year period were used to provide a robust assignment of cataract phenotype. Well-characterized cataract phenotypes are of importance as genetic studies of the AREDS cohort are considered.